Roberto De Zerbi’s future at Marseille is hanging by a thread after the club’s dramatic exit from the Champions League. Despite a 3-0 loss to Club Brugge, Marseille seemed poised to advance to the playoff stage.
However, Benfica’s last-minute 4-2 win over Real Madrid knocked the French side out, leaving De Zerbi under intense scrutiny. The Italian manager has already faced criticism for his European record. Out of ten Champions League matches with Marseille, he has managed just one win, sparking doubts about his tactical ability to guide the team in top-tier competitions.
Critics say De Zerbi lacks the tools to get the most from his squad in high-pressure games. Now that Marseille have exited Europe’s elite tournament, pressure on him is mounting. With the team winning only three of eight league phase games, fans and club officials are closely questioning his decisions and performance, making a managerial change more likely than ever.
De Zerbi Acknowledges Marseille’s Shortcomings
After a crushing defeat at home to Liverpool, Marseille delivered a disappointing performance against Brugge. De Zerbi admitted it was a “very bad day” for the club, highlighting defensive lapses and failure to capitalize on attacking opportunities. He noted the team struggled to match the pace and strength of their opponents.
The manager stressed that errors were compounded by exposure at the back and insufficient offensive execution. Despite attacking efforts, Marseille could not score in either half, leaving players and staff frustrated. De Zerbi called for accountability and reflection on the team’s overall performance.
Sporting director Medhi Benatia criticized the players, but fans and officials continue to scrutinize De Zerbi. Any further slip-ups could push the club toward a managerial change, especially given the high expectations at Marseille.
Read Also: Godo’s Brace Powers Strasbourg to Dominant Victory Over Lille
Chelsea’s Fixture Headache After Rosenior Triumph
Meanwhile, in London, Chelsea face a scheduling dilemma after Liam Rosenior’s dramatic 3-2 win over Napoli. This victory secured a top-eight finish under the new Champions League format, granting the club the right to play the second leg at home a major advantage for knockout ties.
However, Arsenal and Tottenham also earned home advantages for the second leg, creating a congested schedule. UEFA regulations prevent multiple matches in the same city within 50 kilometers on the same night, leaving Chelsea as the odd one out. The club now faces the possibility of being forced to host their home leg at a neutral venue, which could disadvantage the team and fans.
Police and local authorities hesitate to approve multiple high-profile matches in the same city, forcing Chelsea to consider compromises. The exceptional performance of London clubs this season created a unique scheduling problem, rewarding success but causing logistical challenges.
The Neutral Venue Dilemma
UEFA rules state that when a clash cannot be resolved, the lower-ranked team must play at an alternative stadium. For Chelsea, this could mean losing the familiar environment of Stamford Bridge, effectively turning a home advantage into a neutral fixture. Fans would need to travel to a different city, complicating logistics and atmosphere.
An exception exists: a team may request to reverse the tie, playing the first leg at home instead of the second. While this preserves a home game, it forces the decisive match to be away, potentially disadvantaging the team in the most critical fixture.
Chelsea now face a tough decision: risk playing at an alternative venue or reverse the tie and give up the hard-earned second-leg home advantage. With discussions ongoing between UEFA and local authorities, the club must navigate a delicate balance between logistics, fan expectations, and competitive fairness. Keep following other interesting football discussions only on footballcoasters.co.uk.